A-leppo into the abyss?


Goodbye 15 percent? Or …?

When you’re the Libertarian candidate for president, it’s hard enough to be taken seriously, even if you do and say everything right. But in a year when many Americans seem dissatisfied with the Republican and Democratic candidates, Libertarian Gary Johnson has been enjoying unprecedented support (for a Libertarian).

Until Thursday morning.

That’s the conventional wisdom, anyway. Don’t be so quick to buy it.

MSNBC’s Mike Barnacle stumped Johnson on the Morning Joe program by asking what he would do about Aleppo.

“What is Aleppo?” Johnson asked.

Social media lit up. Media types chimed in, noting that presidential candidates ought to know immediately where Aleppo is and why the Syrian city is an important flash point in a multi-faceted conflict that is fueling the region’s refugee crisis.

Many Americans, however, had to admit that they, too, had never heard of Aleppo. At least, that’s the case with the ones I’ve talked to this morning.

Does this matter? Does Johnson no longer have a chance to reach the 15 percent support in polls necessary to be included in presidential debates?

Well …

First of all, 15 percent is a difficult threshold for Johnson even without Aleppo. And, let’s face it, he’s not going to win the White House in any case — not without some unprecedented changes I can’t foresee.

Second, the misstep at least got people talking. Without it, few people would have known Johnson even made an appearance on MSNBC. Now, the nation is abuzz.

Phineas T. Barnum is credited with saying, “There is no such thing as bad publicity.” That isn’t always the case, but it might be in this race, where voters seem to be focused on a lot of things other than Aleppo.

Political history is full of gaffes, especially since the invention of television.

In 1999, George W. Bush stumbled badly when an interviewer from WHDH-TV in Boston asked him to name the leaders of Chechnya, Taiwan, India and Pakistan. He could name only one, the leader of Taiwan.

His campaign responded by saying Bush was trying to become president, “not a Jeopardy contestant.” Many voters must have agreed the question was unfair, although it’s difficult to know. Bush lost the popular vote that year, but he won the Electoral College.

Then we have this famous gaffe by incumbent President Gerald Ford in a debate against Jimmy Carter:

That one was a bit more serious, coming in a widely viewed debate. It wasn’t just a gaffe. The president went on to vigorously defend a statement so obviously wrong it made him look foolish. He lost the election.

But then, Ford was the first Republican to run for president since Richard Nixon resigned in disgrace. Did the gaffe really hurt Ford, or were Americans just not in a mood to reward Republicans in 1976?

And we can’t end this discussion without remembering Vice President Joe Biden’s famous quote from the 2008 presidential campaign, when the nation was in the midst of a financial crisis. He famously told Katie Couric, “When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed.”

Two problems there, of course: Roosevelt wasn’t president when the stock market crashed in 1929, and televisions didn’t invade U.S. homes until after World War II.

The Obama-Biden ticket won anyway. You can say people don’t vote for vice presidents. You can say that with the economy tanking and a Republican having occupied the White House for eight years, a Republican wasn’t going to win in ’08, anyway.

Or maybe you can say we just don’t know what fumbling a question about a city in Syria will mean for a third-party candidate in a most unusual year.




Categories: Politics, Washington

About the Author

Jay Evensen

Jay Evensen is the Senior Editorial Columnist for the Deseret News. He has 32 years of journalism experience covering politics and a variety of other assignments at news organizations ranging from United Press International in New York City to the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Deseret News, where he has worked since 1986. During that time, he has won numerous local, regional and national awards. Most recently, he was given the Cameron Duncan Media Award, given annually in Washington, D.C., by the advocacy group RESULTS, to the journalist judged to have done the most to further the cause of the world's poorest people.

Leave a comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.