Is the honeymoon ending?

You don’t have to be a rabid Republican to see that the media has been inordinately good to President Obama so far. Look at this report from the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. Obama got far better press during his first 100 days than either Bill Clinton or George W. Bush.
That appears to be ending. In recent days, reporters discovered that Obama planted someone from the liberal Huffington Post in a prominent position at a press conference so that he could ask a question about Iran. (Read about it here.)
Then came this exchange over how the audience at a town hall meeting was hand-picked by the Obama administration, and their questions vetted ahead of time. Here is a video of it. Note how White House press corps veteran Helen Thomas jumps in at the end. (I’ve met her many times. She began doing those press conferences when Kennedy was president.)

My take? Presidents always want to control the message, but this sort of thing flies in the face of Obama’s promise of openness and transparency.
As for the press — I can already anticipate the posts by people who think Obama already controls us. But nothing gets reporters more riled than the perception they are being manipulated. Call it the first sign the honeymoon is at least straining.

Categories: Uncategorized

About the Author

Jay Evensen

Jay Evensen is the Associate Editor of the Deseret News editorial page. He has 30 years of journalism experience covering politics and a variety of other assignments at news organizations ranging from United Press International in New York City to the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Deseret News, where he has worked for 26 years. During that time, he has won numerous local, regional and national awards. Most recently, he was given the Cameron Duncan Media Award, given annually in Washington, D.C., by the advocacy group RESULTS, to the journalist judged to have done the most to further the cause of the world's poorest people.

Leave a comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.

*