Weird liquor laws?

First, to “Oh please,” (why do I get one of those with almost every post?): I don’t mind the insults. Particularly when they come anonymously, they mean nothing. But my concerns about charitable deductions have nothing to do with tithing. I don’t earn enough to be affected, and I don’t benefit from anyone else’s tithing. The truth is conservatives and religious people are much more giving than liberals. A reduction in charitable deductions will hurt contributions, and it will hurt the poor.
Now, on to liquor laws.

Before you rail on Utah’s strange rules, you should read this description of Mississippi’s laws. It could be worse.
My main concern is that state law ought to be reasonable and sensible, while still not encouraging irresponsible alcohol consumption. The compromise current being considered (Read about it here) seems to be a move in that direction.
You can argue about the ridiculousness of requiring drinks to be prepared out of the sight of customers, but really that’s a small compromise. What little I know of the deal, including the increased penalties for DUI, seems reasonable for locals, tourists and the general welfare.
What do you think?