Smoke 'em if you got 'em

I have two wishes regarding state taxes.
One is that the Legislature will dramatically increase the state’s tax on cigarettes, which currently is an embarrassingly low 69.5 cents per pack. The other is that the state will completely remove its sales tax from groceries, which currently is 1.75 percent, and which hurts low-income people the most.
But I wouldn’t dream of combining the two. Unfortunately, that’s what Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. wants to do. His proposed $3 a pack tax is being billed as revenue neutral.
Well…
Every time the cost of smoking rises, there is a noticeable dip in the number of people who smoke (Here’s a news story to back that up). Heck, maybe even Barack Obama could be persuaded to quit.
But if you rely on tobacco taxes both for public health reasons and to fund state government, what happens if a lot of people really do quit? Which “sin” do you then tax to make up the difference?

Categories: Uncategorized

About the Author

Jay Evensen

Jay Evensen is the Associate Editor of the Deseret News editorial page. He has 30 years of journalism experience covering politics and a variety of other assignments at news organizations ranging from United Press International in New York City to the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Deseret News, where he has worked for 26 years. During that time, he has won numerous local, regional and national awards. Most recently, he was given the Cameron Duncan Media Award, given annually in Washington, D.C., by the advocacy group RESULTS, to the journalist judged to have done the most to further the cause of the world's poorest people.

Leave a comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.

*